Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Can J Diabetes ; 2023 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2317708

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There was rapid uptake of pediatric diabetes telehealth at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and initial studies demonstrated good usability and satisfaction. As exposure to telehealth continued to increase during the pandemic, we aimed to determine changes in telehealth usability and changes in future preferences for telehealth care. METHODS: A telehealth questionnaire was administered early in the pandemic and again more than 1 year later. Survey data were linked with a clinical data registry. A multivariable proportional odds logistic mixed-effects model was used to assess the association between exposure to telehealth and outcome of future preference for telehealth. Multivariable linear mixed-effects models were used to examine associations between exposure to early and later pandemic periods and the outcome of usability scores. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 40%, with 87 early and 168 later period participants. Virtual visits increased from 46% to 92% of all telehealth visits. Virtual visits improved in "ease of use" (p=0.0013) and "satisfaction" (p=0.045); there were no improvements in telephone visits. The odds of indicating higher preference for more future telehealth visits was 5.1-fold higher in the later pandemic group (p=0.0298). Eighty percent of participants would like their future care to include telehealth visits. CONCLUSIONS: At our tertiary diabetes centre, families' desire for future telehealth care has increased during this 1-year period of additional telehealth exposure, and virtual care has now become the preferred option. This study provides important family perspectives that can help guide development of future diabetes clinical care.

2.
Can J Diabetes ; 2022 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2309873

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study was to characterise the relationship between comorbid mental health diagnosis and diabetes type on inpatient length of stay (LOS). METHODS: This retrospective, chart review study was conducted at a community hospital in Ontario, Canada. Individuals admitted to the inpatient mental health unit with a reported diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes were included in the analysis. Relevant data related to mental health conditions at admission and LOS were collected from the electronic health record. Analyses of variance and coviariance were used to determine the impact on LOS. RESULTS: A total of 249 encounters were included in the analyses. Overall, individuals with type 2 diabetes (mean, 14.70 days; standard deviation, 15.75 days) had a significantly longer LOS than individuals with type 1 diabetes (mean, 8.01 days; standard deviation, 7.27 days). Upon including sociodemographic factors, individuals older in age and with a most recent admission of <1 year also had a longer LOS. There was no significant relationship between the most responsible mental health diagnosis and LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with type 2 diabetes may be more likely to have a longer LOS in inpatient mental health settings than those with type 1 diabetes. More dedicated support would be beneficial for this population. Future work should focus on in-depth exploration of the challenges that lead to the observed LOS.

3.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1146443, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2291423

ABSTRACT

Background: The cross-protective nature of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 virus was previously suggested, however its effect in COVID-19 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and the underlying metabolic pathways has not been addressed. This study aims to investigate the difference in the metabolomic patterns of type 2 diabetic patients with BCG vaccination showing different severity levels of COVID-19 infection. Methods: Sixty-seven COVID-19 patients were categorized into diabetic and non-diabetic individuals who had been previously vaccinated or not with BCG vaccination. Targeted metabolomics were performed from serum samples from all patients using tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis included multivariate and univariate models. Results: Data suggested that while BCG vaccination may provide protection for individuals who do not have diabetes, it appears to be linked to more severe COVID-19 symptoms in T2D patients (p = 0.02). Comparing the metabolic signature of BCG vaccinated T2D individuals to non-vaccinated counterparts revealed that amino acid (sarcosine), cholesterol esters (CE 20:0, 20:1, 22:2), carboxylic acid (Aconitic acid) were enriched in BCG vaccinated T2D patients, whereas spermidine, glycosylceramides (Hex3Cer(d18:1_22:0), Hex2Cer(d18:1/22:0), HexCer(d18:1/26:1), Hex2Cer(d18:1/24:0), HexCer(d18:1/22:0) were higher in BCG vaccinated non- T2D patients. Furthermore, data indicated a decrease in sarcosine synthesis from glycine and choline and increase in spermidine synthesis in the BCG vaccinated cohort in T2D and non-T2D groups, respectively. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests increased severity of COVID-19 in BCG vaccinated T2D patients, which was marked by decreased sarcosine synthesis, perhaps via lower sarcosine-mediated removal of viral antigens.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Humans , BCG Vaccine , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Pilot Projects , Sarcosine , Spermidine , Vaccination/methods
4.
Can J Diabetes ; 47(4): 352-358, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292406

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of death among patients with COVID-19. However, the available studies lack detail on COVID-19 illness severity and measurement of relevant comorbidities. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective cohort study of patients 18 years of age and older who were hospitalized with COVID-19 between January 1, 2020, and November 30, 2020, in Ontario, Canada, and Copenhagen, Denmark. Chart abstraction emphasizing comorbidities and disease severity was performed by trained research personnel. The association between diabetes and death was measured using Poisson regression. The main outcome measure was in-hospital 30-day risk of death. RESULTS: Our study included 1,133 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Ontario and 305 in Denmark, of whom 405 and 75 patients, respectively, had pre-existing diabetes. In both Ontario and Denmark, patients with diabetes were more likely to be older; have chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and higher troponin levels; and be receiving antibiotics, when compared with adults without diabetes. In Ontario, 24% (n=96) of adults with diabetes died compared with 15% (n=109) of adults without diabetes. In Denmark, 16% (n=12) of adults with diabetes died in hospital compared with 13% (n=29) of those without diabetes. In Ontario, the crude mortality ratio among patients with diabetes was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24 to 2.07) and in the adjusted regression model it was 1.19 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.66). In Denmark, the crude mortality ratio among patients with diabetes was 1.27 (95% CI, 0.68 to 2.36) and in the adjusted model it was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.49 to 1.54). Meta-analysis of the 2 rate ratios from each region resulted in a crude mortality ratio of 1.55 (95% CI, 1.22 to 1.96) and an adjusted mortality ratio of 1.11 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.47). CONCLUSION: The presence of diabetes was not strongly associated with in-hospital COVID-19 mortality independent of illness severity and other comorbidities.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Humans , Adult , Adolescent , Cohort Studies , Ontario/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Risk Factors , Hospitalization , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Denmark/epidemiology
5.
Can J Diabetes ; 2023 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2254705

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes is a major public health problem in Canada and requires multifactorial, consistent clinical management. The COVID-19 pandemic has increased challenges in the management of many chronic ailments, including diabetes. Diabetes was associated with a higher risk of severe illness in the context of COVID-19. Pandemic restrictions also impacted diabetes care continuity, which may have contributed to an increased risk of diabetes-related complications and mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of prescription patterns of antihyperglycemic medications claimed by individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic using the IQVIA Canada Longitudinal Prescription Claims database. The study period was from March 1, 2018, to February 28, 2021. The study outcomes are described on a monthly, quarterly, and yearly basis and overall, and by medication, medication class, and insurance coverage type. "New-to-molecule" patients were defined as those claiming a medication during the analysis period that they had no history of claiming in the database. Adults with at least 1 year of prescription history available and claiming their first prescription for an antihyperglycemic drug during the analysis period were classified as newly diagnosed with T2D. RESULTS: A similar number of people had at least 1 non-insulin antihyperglycemic prescription during the baseline, prepandemic, and pandemic periods in Canada (1,778,155, 1,822,403, and 1,797,272, respectively). However, the number of people initiating newer antihyperglycemic medications decreased at the beginning of the pandemic, in contrast to older medications, which remained consistent across the pandemic period. The number of people diagnosed with T2D decreased in the early months of the pandemic but recovered by October 2020. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 epidemic in Canada impacted clinical care for at-risk Canadians, with fewer being prescribed newer antihyperglycemic drugs and a reduction in the number of diagnoses of T2D.

6.
Can J Diabetes ; 46(4): 419-427, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257535

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had significant impact on research directions and productivity in the past 2 years. Despite these challenges, since 2020, more than 2,500 peer-reviewed articles have been published on pancreatic islet biology. These include updates on the roles of isocitrate dehydrogenase, pyruvate kinase and incretin hormones in insulin secretion, as well as the discovery of inceptor and signalling by circulating RNAs. The year 2020 also brought advancements in in vivo and in vitro models, including a new transgenic mouse for assessing beta-cell proliferation, a "pancreas-on-a-chip" to study glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and successful genetic editing of primary human islet cells. Islet biologists evaluated the functionality of stem-cell-derived islet-like cells coated with semipermeable biomaterials to prevent autoimmune attack, revealing the importance of cell maturation after transplantation. Prompted by observations that COVID-19 symptoms can worsen for people with obesity or diabetes, researchers examined how islets are directly affected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Herein, we highlight novel functional insights, technologies and therapeutic approaches that emerged between March 2020 and July 2021, written for both scientific and lay audiences. We also include a response to these advancements from patient stakeholders, to help lend a broader perspective to developments and challenges in islet research.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Islets of Langerhans , Animals , Biology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/therapy , Humans , Insulin , Islets of Langerhans/physiology , Mice
7.
Can J Diabetes ; 47(3): 236-242.e3, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239847

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our aim in this study was to evaluate the impact of virtual care for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This multiple methods program evaluation used the Quadruple Aim Framework. The impact on patient experience, cost, and provider satisfaction was assessed using surveys and interviews. Chi-square and Poisson statistics were used to compare clinical outcomes before (April 2019 to February 2020) and after (May 2020 to March 2021) the shift to virtual care. RESULTS: Patient experience surveys were completed by 85 women. Most of them rated their virtual care experience as good or excellent (93%), with a preference for continued virtual visits in the future (84%). Most respondents felt virtual care saved them money (93%) and time (98%). Six health-care providers at the Diabetes in Pregnancy Clinic were interviewed and all believed the switch to virtual care was largely positive. Overall, interview transcripts revealed that health-care providers were happy with the transition, although nurses initially perceived an increased workload. There were no significant differences in rates of cesarean section procedures, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admissions or the proportion of appointments at which insulin was initiated between in-person and virtual care patient outcomes. There was a decreased proportion of missed appointments after the switch to virtual care (6.15% vs 1.21%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: There has been high patient and provider satisfaction with virtual GDM care, with no difference in clinical outcomes and fewer missed appointments. Virtual GDM care should remain an option in the future.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes, Gestational , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Cesarean Section , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , Fetal Macrosomia/epidemiology
8.
Can J Diabetes ; 2022 Aug 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236024

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: For women with pre-existing and gestational diabetes, pregnancy involves specialized and intensive medical care to optimize maternal and infant outcomes. Medical management for patients with diabetes in pregnancy typically occurs via frequent face-to-face outpatient appointments. COVID-19-induced barriers to face-to-face care have identified the need for high-quality, patient-centred virtual health-care modalities, such as mobile health (mHealth) technologies. Our aim in this review was to identify the patient-reported benefits and limitations of mHealth technologies among women with diabetes in pregnancy. We also aimed to determine how the women's experiences aligned with the best practice standards for patient-centred communication. METHODS: The framework presented by Arksey and O'Malley for conducting scoping reviews, with refinements by Levac et al, was used to guide this review. Relevant studies were identified through comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare and PsycINFO. Thomas and Harden's methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews guided the synthesis of patient-reported benefits and limitations of mHealth technology. RESULTS: Overall, 19 studies describing the use of 16 unique mobile health technologies among 742 women were included in the final review. Patient-reported benefits of mobile health included convenience, support of psychosocial well-being and facilitation of diabetes self-management. Patient-reported limitations included lack of important technological features, perceived burdensome aspects of mHealth and lack of trust in virtual health care. CONCLUSIONS: Women with diabetes report some benefits from mHealth use during pregnancy. Codesigning future technologies with end-users may help address the perceived limitations and effectiveness of mHealth technologies.

9.
Can J Diabetes ; 47(4): 345-351, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2180193

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes requires ongoing monitoring and care to prevent long-term adverse health outcomes. In Canada, quarantine restrictions were put into place to address the coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020. Primary care diabetes clinics limited their in-person services and were advised to manage type 2 diabetes (T2D) through virtual visits and reduce the frequency of routine diabetes-related lab tests and screening. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used de-identified patient records from a primary care electronic medical records database in Ontario, Canada, to identify people with T2D who had at least 1 health-care touchpoint between March 1, 2018, and February 28, 2021. Outcomes were described on a monthly or yearly basis: 1) number of people with primary care visits (in-person vs virtual); 2) number of people with referrals; 3) number of people with each of the vital/lab measures; and 4) results of the vital/lab measures. RESULTS: A total of 16,845 individuals with T2D were included. Compared with the pre-pandemic period, the COVID-19 period had a 16.8% reduction in the T2D population utilizing any primary care and an increase of 330.4% in the number of people with at least 1 virtual visit. Compared with the pre-pandemic period, fewer people had vital/lab measures in the pandemic period. However, among the people with the test results available, the average values for all tests were similar in the pre- and pandemic periods. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to understand the impact of the reduction of in-person clinical care on the entire population with T2D.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Adult , Humans , Ontario/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Primary Health Care
10.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases ; 9(Supplement 2):S763, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2189942

ABSTRACT

Background. COVID-19 (C-19) vaccines have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing SARS-CoV-2 related morbidity/mortality. The duration of protection in the general population is showing a waning immunity over time. Variable antibody responses to C-19 vaccines have been shown in persons living with HIV. We followed the anti-SARS-CoV-2 receptor biding domain (RBD) antibody titers, after 2 and 3 (booster) C-19 vaccinations, in US Veterans living with HIV (USVLH). Methods. Retrospective chart review of USVLH who had received C-19 vaccinations at Northport VAMC. Testing was done with the © Beckman Coulter enzyme immunoassay measuring total IgG antibody to the RBD, a critical target of neutralizing antibodies within the spike protein encoded in the mRNA vaccines. Titers were drawn after the 2nd and 3rd doses C-19 vaccines in variable timing. Demographic data, CD4+ T cell counts nadir and current, HIV viral load, comorbid conditions were reviewed. Results. We analyzed the SARS CoV-2 RBD IgG titers in 50 vaccinated USVLH. The median age is 65 years (range 36-75). 50% were Black, Caucasian 40%, Hispanic 10%. Risk factor for HIV infection, Heterosexual 52%, IVDU 18%, MSM 26%, needle stick 2%, blood transfusion 2%. The median CD4 nadir was 200/muL (5- 600), median current CD4 656 (174-1529). All USVLH were on HAART, 92% on INSTI-based therapy. 45 had undetectable HIV viral load (< 20), 5 had viremia from 22 to 563 copies. Medical conditions: diabetes 30%, CAD 18%, HTN 60%, COPD 8%, HLD 66%, smokers 18%. Six USV had C-19 prior to vaccination, and six had C-19 after vaccination with median 102 days (90-148) from last vaccine dose. Vaccines given: Janssen in 3 USVLH: Moderna (MOD)- 2 doses: 4;MOD-3 doses:5;Pfizer (PFZ)-2: 6;PFZ-3: 32. IgG titers decrease with time after 2nd vaccine dose and increase after booster dose. IgG titers checked after 2nd dose median days 120 (11-392) {titers: median 4.63 S/CO [0.17 - 53.66]}, 91 days (5-181) after 3rd dose {titers: median 16.22 [1.15-73.92]}. Titers were higher in MOD-2 vs. PFZ-2, median 25.7 vs. 4.63, P: 0.039, MOD-3 vs. PFZ-3 33.89 vs. 15.5, P: 0.117. No death due to C-19 was seen. SARS-CoV-2 RBD IgG titers in US Veterans living with HIV after 2nd dose of COVID vaccine. COVID-19 VACCINATED IN US VETERANS LIVING WITH HIV N=50 Conclusion. In a cohort of USVLH, well controlled on HAART, C-19 vaccinations produced a serologic response that decayed over time and increased after booster dose. MOD vaccine may have achieved higher titers than PFZ.

11.
IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science ; 1114(1):012082, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2160871

ABSTRACT

This study aim to improve the quality of Phyllanthus sp production by increasing the content of secondary metabolites as a bioactive compound. Phyllanthus sp contains various secondary metabolites that enhance immunity and treat diabetes, hypertension, antioxidants, anti-cancer, kidney disorders, and other illnesses. Since the Covid-19 pandemic, Phyllanthus sp widely used as a raw material for making herbal medicines. The trade value of Indonesian herbal medicines is estimated to increase in 2022, and the price will reach around the US $ 910 million, so it has very bright business prospects. These relatively limited phytopharmaceutical products constrain the supply of high-quality raw materials under the requirements of the herb medicine industry. Therefore, conducting a depth assessment related to efforts to improve the quality of Phyllanthus sp production by increasing the content of secondary metabolites is necessary. The efforts to enhance the quality of Phyllanthus sp as a source of herbal medicine raw materials can be made through plant breeding such as genetic mutations and in combination with the environmental arrangements of soil water content and solar radiation intensity. The efforts to increase the quality of herbal medicine raw materials are critical to support the development of the herbal medicine industry.

12.
Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences ; 16(10):182-184, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2156411

ABSTRACT

Background: A hypersensitivity condition called cytokine storm is the main cause of death in COVID-19 patients. A monoclonal antibody called tocilizumab may be able to suppress the Interleukin-6 receptors (IL-6R) and lessen the likelihood that the body would have a hypersensitive immune response. Aim(s): To evaluate the mortality advantages of tocilizumab in individuals with COVID-19. Study design: Retrospective study. Place and duration of study: Bahria Town International Hospital Lahore from 16th June 2020 to 17th September 2021. Methodology: Patients with 96 confirmed instances of COVID-19 were enrolled. Two groups of patients were created. A single dosage of tocilizumab was administered to 52 participants in the first group, referred to as the survivors, and 44 patients in the second group, who passed away within 14 days. From the patients' medical records, the demographic information, co-morbid conditions, and laboratory values were obtained. The hospital's institutional review board and ethics committee (IRBEC) gave its approval for this study. The permission was ignored because this was a retroactive analysis. Result(s): 54.24 16.58 was the average age, and 54 (56.25%) of the population were men. 52 (54.16%) patients were survivors, compared to 44(45.83%) patients in the non-survivor group. In non-survivors compared to survivors, the older age group was shown to be statistically significant (62.78+/-12.86 vs. 51.65+/-11.68, p=0.003). Additionally, non-survivors had a greater BMI (p=0.006). In our study, hypertension and diabetes were the two co-morbid conditions that were most frequently detected (35.24% and 28.94%, respectively). The mortality rates among patients with diabetes, asthma, COPD, and cancer were all considerably higher (P=0.01, 0.006, and 0.004, respectively). Cancer and type-2 diabetes patients had death rates that were considerably higher (p=0.05 and p=0.01, respectively). C-reactive protein (CRP), D. Dimer, procalcitonin (PCT), and IL-6 were discovered to be the significant predictors of mortality (p 0.0001, 0.05, 0.001, and 0.004 respectively). Conclusion(s): Even though tocilizumab is authorised and has been shown to have positive results, people with diabetes, COPD, and asthma are more likely to experience negative results even after getting a single dosage of the medication. Similar to CRP, D. Dimer levels are reliable indicators of death. Copyright © 2022 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.

13.
Can J Diabetes ; 2022 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1996319

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to compare rates of anthropometric, blood pressure (BP) and glycated hemoglobin (A1C) measurements and laboratory screening for hypothyroidism, nephropathy and dyslipidemia in children and youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D), 1 year before and after the onset of COVID-19. METHODS: Clinical data were analyzed from a voluntary registry of children and youth with T1D followed at the BC Children's Hospital between March 2019 and 2021. Logistic and Poisson mixed-effect models were used. RESULTS: Four hundred forty patients, with median (interquartile range) age and time since diagnosis 12.7 (9.5 to 15.4) and 4.7 (2.6 to 7.9) years, respectively, were included. Clinic visits were all in-person before March 2020, and 99% via telemedicine afterward. The number of visits per patient was 2 (2 to 3), with a 6% increase during the pandemic (relative risk [RR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 1.10). There was a substantial decrease in height, weight and BP measurements (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.36; RR, 0.34, 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.38; RR, 0.005, 95% CI, 0.002 to 0.014, respectively); only 49% of patients had anthropometric and 1% BP data during the pandemic year, compared with >97% before the pandemic. A1C measurements dropped from 3 (2 to 4) to 1 (1 to 2) per patient per year (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.57). Rates of screening investigations were suboptimal before the pandemic, and these rates continued to decline. CONCLUSIONS: Shifting to telemedicine allowed ongoing care during the pandemic, but the frequency of anthropometric, BP and A1C measurements decreased dramatically. A combined telemedicine/in-person model may be needed to ensure adequate care for this population.

14.
Can J Diabetes ; 46(4): 346-352.e1, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1828792

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric diabetes health-care providers and decision-makers in British Columbia (BC) have prioritized the creation of a provincial pediatric diabetes clinical registry to improve care quality. Our objective is to build the first BC Pediatrics Diabetes Registry (BC-PDR) for quality improvement and coordination of pediatric diabetes care across the province. METHODS: Patients <19 years of age and diagnosed with diabetes were invited to participate in our study. Recruitment began in 2017 at the BC Children's Hospital (BCCH) and expanded to 6 community-based pediatric diabetes clinics in the Interior Health Authority (HA) in 2019. In response to COVID-19, recruitment shifted from in-person to virtual using an electronic consent system. Patient-level (e.g. age at diabetes onset, ethnicity) and visit-level (e.g. glycated hemoglobin [A1C], blood pressure, diabetes regimen, technology use, medications) data were collected in addition to screening for and presence of diabetes complications. RESULTS: As of January 2021, 635 patients from the BCCH and Interior HA were included in the BC-PDR. From the BCCH, 94% of 590 patients were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and the median A1C was 7.8% and increased with age. Just under half of the BCCH patients were using insulin pump technology and/or a continuous glucose monitoring system. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last 3 years, we have worked to adapt and operationalize the BC-PDR. The next steps for the BC-PDR include engaging diabetes stakeholders in the development of an electronic benchmarking dashboard along with linkage of the data to patient-reported outcome and experience measures and provincial administrative databases.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Registries , Adolescent , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , British Columbia/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans
15.
Can J Diabetes ; 2022 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1814638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health prevention measures have led to a disruption of the delivery of routine care and may have had an impact on the quality of diabetes care. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the extent to which structure, process and outcome quality measures in diabetes care changed in the first 6 months of the pandemic compared with previous periods. METHODS: A before-and-after observational study of all community-living Ontario residents >20 years of age and living with diabetes. The patients were divided into 3 cohorts: a pandemic cohort, alive March to September 2020 (n=1,393,404); reference cohort 1, alive March to September 2019 (n=1,415,490); and reference cohort 2, alive September 2019 to February 2020 (n=1,444,000). Outcome measures were in-person/virtual visits to general practitioners and specialists, eye examinations, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) testing, filled prescriptions, and admissions to emergency departments (EDs) and hospitals for acute and chronic diabetes complications. RESULTS: The probability of an in-person visit to a GP decreasing by 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47% to 47%) in the pandemic period compared with both previous periods. The probability of having an eye exam was lower by 43% (95% CI, 44% to 43%), an A1C test by 28% (95% CI, 29% to 28%) and an LDL test by 31% (95% CI, 31% to 31%) in the pandemic period compared with the same 6-month period the year before. There were very small decreases in drug prescriptions and decreases of 18% and 16% in ED and hospital visits for complications. CONCLUSIONS: We observed disruptions to both structure and processes measures of diabetes care in Ontario during the first wave of the pandemic.

16.
Can J Diabetes ; 46(4): 404-410, 2022 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1814637

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescents and young adults living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) involved in the national Improving Renal Complications in Adolescents with T2D through REsearch (iCARE) study. METHODS: The Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) COVID-19 Questionnaire developed by the National Institutes of Health ECHO COVID-19 Task Force was administered to participants (n=85) from the iCARE study between June 2020 and October 2020. Children 12 years old (via parent report) and adolescents and young adults ≥13 years old (via self-report) participated. The questionnaire assessed the impact of the pandemic on health-care appointments, lifestyle, internet use, social connections and mental health. RESULTS: Participants were 17.0±3.1 (range, 12 to 27) years of age and predominantly female (61.3%). During the pandemic, 69.4% were able to attend their health-care appointments by telephone or virtual platforms, 31.7% ate more, 45.1% slept more and 29.3% spent less time on physical activities. There was an increase in internet use for both educational (42.0%) and noneducational purposes (54.9%). Participants felt less socially connected (64.6%). Participants also felt sometimes (59.2%), often (19.7%) and very often (6.7%) satisfied with their lives. DISCUSSION: Our study revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic has had various impacts on the daily lives of adolescents and young adults living with T2D. Future research should include longitudinal studies of the health burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on this population, with a more in-depth evaluation of mental health outcomes and clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Delivery of Health Care , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
17.
Médecine des Maladies Métaboliques ; 2022.
Article in French | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1628924

ABSTRACT

Résumé Introduction Les patients diabétiques présentent un risque élevé de contracter la grippe saisonnière et de développer des complications graves en raison de leur terrain immunitaire fragilisé. Les déterminants de la vaccination contre la grippe ont été peu étudiés chez les patients diabétiques en France. Méthodes Cette enquête a été initiée par un comité scientifique constitué de médecins et de représentants d’une association de patients. Elle a été menée auprès de patients diabétiques en 2020 afin d’estimer leur couverture vaccinale antigrippale pour les années 2019 et 2020 et d’identifier les déterminants de la vaccination et de la non-vaccination. Résultats Au total, 3710 patients diabétiques ont participé à l’enquête. Les facteurs significativement associés à une meilleure couverture vaccinale incluaient : âge avancé, sexe masculin, crainte d’une infection grippale, précédente infection grippale, et traitement antidiabétique injectable. Les facteurs significativement associés à une moins bonne couverture vaccinale incluaient : jeune âge, sexe féminin, et traitement antidiabétique oral. Conclusion Cette étude nous a permis de mieux cerner les facteurs associés à la non-vaccination antigrippale chez les patients diabétiques en France. La sensibilisation de ces patients doit être poursuivie avec des campagnes de communication ciblant tout particulièrement les populations plus à risque de ne pas être vaccinées, telles que les jeunes diabétiques, les femmes, ainsi que les patients traités par antidiabétiques oraux. Summary Introduction Diabetic patients are at high risk of developing seasonal influenza. Influenza-related complications are particularly serious in these patients because of their weakened immune system. However, data on the determinants of seasonal influenza vaccination and non-vaccination among people with diabetes are still sparse. Methods A survey was conducted to identify the determinants of accepting and not-accepting influenza vaccination among people with diabetes in France. Results Overall, 3,710 diabetic patients participated in the survey. The determinants of vaccine acceptance included advanced age, men, fear of getting the flu, past flu infection, as well as injectable diabetes treatment. In contrast, the determinants of vaccine non-acceptance included younger age, women, as well as oral diabetes treatment. Conclusion Not all French diabetic patients are convinced of the need to get vaccinated against influenza infection. This survey enabled us to better understand the determinants of vaccination acceptance and non-acceptance among people with diabetes in France. In order to increase the vaccination coverage of diabetic patients, their awareness must be raised via campaigns, targeting those at risk of not being vaccinated: younger age, women, as well as those taking oral diabetes treatment.

18.
Can J Diabetes ; 46(3): 253-261, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1474706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Greater risk of adverse health outcomes and public health measures have increased distress among people with diabetes during the coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The objectives of this study were to explore how the experiences of people with diabetes during the COVID-19 pandemic differ according to sociodemographic characteristics and identify diabetes-related psychosocial correlates of COVID distress. METHODS: Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes were recruited from clinics and community health centres in Toronto, Ontario, as well as patient networks. Participants were interviewed to explore the experiences of people with diabetes with varied sociodemographic and clinical identities, with respect to wellness (physical, emotional, social, financial, occupational), level of stress and management strategies. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the relationships between diabetes distress, diabetes self-efficacy and resilient coping with COVID distress. RESULTS: Interviews revealed that specific aspects of psychosocial wellness affected by the pandemic, and stress and illness management strategies utilized by people with diabetes differed based on socioeconomic status, gender, type of diabetes and race. Resilient coping (ß=-0.0517; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.0918 to -0.0116; p=0.012), diabetes distress (ß=0.0260; 95% CI, 0.0149 to 0.0371; p<0.0001) and diabetes self-efficacy (ß=-0.0184; 95% CI, -0.0316 to -0.0052; p=0.007) were significantly associated with COVID distress. CONCLUSIONS: Certain subgroups of people with diabetes have experienced a disproportionate amount of COVID distress. Assessing correlates of COVID distress among people with diabetes will help inform interventions such as diabetes self-management education to address the psychosocial distress caused by the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Self Efficacy
19.
Can J Diabetes ; 45(6): 524-530, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1317699

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Patients with diabetes are potentially at higher risk of mortality due to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes and severity of pulmonary involvement in COVID-19 patients with and without diabetes. METHODS: In this cohort study, we recruited patients with diabetes who were hospitalized due to COVID-19 during the period from February 2020 to May 2020. Hospitalized individuals without diabetes were enrolled as control subjects. All patients were followed for 90 days and clinical findings and patients' outcomes were reported. RESULTS: Over a period of 4 months, 127 patients with diabetes and 127 individuals without diabetes with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were recruited. Their mean age was 65.70±12.51 years. Mortality was higher in the group with diabetes (22.8% vs 15.0%; p=0.109), although not significantly. More severe pulmonary involvement (p=0.015), extended hospital stay (p<0.001) and greater need for invasive ventilation (p=0.029) were reported in this population. Stepwise logistic regression revealed that diabetes was not independently associated with mortality (p=0.092). Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.054; p=0.003), aggravated pulmonary involvement on admission (OR, 1.149; p=0.001), presence of comorbidities (OR, 1.290; p=0.020) and hypothyroidism (OR, 6.576; p=0.021) were associated with mortality. Diabetic foot infection had a strong positive correlation with mortality (OR, 49.819; p=0.016), whereas insulin therapy had a negative correlation (OR, 0.242; p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: The mortality rate due to COVID-19 did not differ significantly between patients with or without diabetes. Older age, macrovascular complications and presence of comorbidities could increase mortality in people with diabetes. Insulin therapy during hospitalization could attenuate the detrimental effects of hyperglycemia and improve prognosis of patients with COVID-19 and diabetes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/mortality , Hospitalization/trends , Respiration Disorders/mortality , Severity of Illness Index , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/therapy , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnostic imaging , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Respiration Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Respiration Disorders/therapy
20.
Therapie ; 2020 Apr 23.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1221032

ABSTRACT

According to previous reports, diabetes seems to be associated with serious clinical events due to COVID-19. But is diabetes per se a risk factor of being infected by the virus? We discuss these points. Data about the antidiabetic drugs are scarce. Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) is found as both a cell surface protein ubiquitously expressed in many tissues and as a soluble molecule found in serum/plasma, fluids. DPP-4 is involved in infection of cells by some viruses. We relate data about the use of DPP-4 inhibitors in diabetic patients. We conclude relating French and international recommendations in people with diabetes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL